Effect of Hydropolitics Relations on the Nation-Building Process, Case Study: Rogun Dam Superstructure in Tajikistan

Document Type : Applied Article

10.22067/jwsd.v7i4.86939

Abstract

The pursuit and construction of superstructures by the rulers has a special place in the process of nation Building of many countries. In post-Soviet countries, rulers have sought to politically manage space and maintain social influence and control over the past two decades to demonstrate their legitimacy by building large water-based infrastructures. The Rogun Dam in Tajikistan is a superstructure on the Vakhsh River, which if built at 335 meters, is the highest dam in the world, providing the country's energy self-sufficiency. By presenting a geopolitical conception of national progress and pride, these identities have been able to play a role in the emergence and empowerment of nationalist discourse in this country. The present article is based on the hypothesis that the symbolic meaning of the Rogun Dam in the geopolitical code nationalization process is to explain the Tajik government's insistence over the past two decades to complete this costly and tense plan with neighboring countries. The information required for the research is collected by the library method and the methodology governing the text is descriptive-analytical in nature. The results showed that the idea of building the Rogun Dam enables Tajik political elites to divert people's attention from internal challenges, promising them a better future, arousing a sense of national pride and increasing their legitimacy, the country's survival and guarantee the government. Uzbekistan's opposition to the construction of the Rogun Dam could also be used as a kind of hydro political confrontation to strengthen national solidarity against the Uzbek enemy. Because those who challenge its construction are the enemy of the nation.

Keywords

• Hydropolitic
• Nation Building
• Symbol
• Tajikistan
• Rogun Dam

Main Subjects

• Water Management and Economy

---

References

امیراحمدیان، ب. و ناصری، م. 1392. بحران آب در آسیای مرکزی: با تأکید بر مناقشه کشورهای منطقه بر سر مسئله آب. فصلنامه مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی، 6(12): 1-20.
حافظ‌نیا، م. 1381. جغرافیای سیاسی ایران. انتشارات سمت.
درخور، م. و فرجی‌راد، ع. و میرهاشمی، ع. 1392. بحران آب و نتایج زیست‏محیطی آن در آسیای مرکزی. فصلنامه مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی، (6)12: 41-54.
رضایی اسکندری، د. 1389. چشم انداز جهانی بحران آب: مطالعه موردی بحران آب در آسیای مرکزی؛ دلایل و ‏راهکارها. فصلنامه آسیای مرکزی و قفقاز، 17(69): 51-74.
صالح‌آبادی، ر. 1393. بررسی چالش‌های هیدروپلیتیک منابع آب در منطقه ژئوپلیتیک آسیای مرکزی. فصلنامه سیاست خارجی، 28(2): 347-381
طاهری‌عطار، غ. 1392. طراحی و تبیین الگوی ملّت‌سازی پایدار. فصلنامه‌ی پژوهش‌های راهبردی سیاست، 2(7): 34-67.
کولایی، ا. و سلطانی، م. 1392. ‏مسئله آب و روابط کشورهای آسیای مرکزی. فصلنامه سیاست جهانی، 2(3): 7-34.
کاویانی‌راد، م. 1397. جزوه درسی هیدروپلیتیک، منتشر نشده، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی دانشگاه خوارزمی.
کاویانی‌راد، م. 1398. هیدروپلیتیک: سویه‏ها و رویکردها، انتشارات پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی. چاپ اول. تهران.
کوزه‌گر کالجی، و. 1397 الف. بهبود مناسبات ازبکستان و تاجیکستان؛ آیا خواب دوشنبه و تاشکند تعبیر خواهد شد؟ موسسه مطالعات ایران. www.iras.ir/fa/www.iras.irfa/doc/note/3136
کوزه‌گر کالجی، و. 1397 ب. منافع و ملاحظات کشورهای خارج از طرح انتقال برق کاسا ١٠٠٠. موسسه مطالعات ایراس. www.iras.ir/fa/doc/article/3671
2018. افتتاح بلندترین سد جهان در تاجیکستان؛ دوشنبه صادرکننده برق می‌شود. خبرگزاری یورونیوز.
https://per.euronews.com/2018/11/16/highest-dam-in-the-world-inaugurated-in-tajikistan-country-to-export-electricity
Bologov P. 2016.The Rogun Dam: A Source of Division in Central Asia. https://carnegie.ru/commentary/66334.
Blakkisrud H. and Shahnoza N. 2010. History writing and nation building in postindependenceTajikistan. Nationalities Papers, 38(2): 173–89.
Bergne P. 2007. The birth of Tajikistan: National identity and the origins of the Republic. London: I.B. Tauris.
Fradchuk A. 2010. “Tajikistan's Energy Dilemma.” Institute for War and Peace Reporting, February 15. Accessed March 12, 2012. http://iwpr.net/report-news/tajikistans-energy-dilemma.
GARCÉS Fernando. 2014. The World Bank considers feasible the building of the Tajik Rogun dam. Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies. European Parliament.
Heathershaw J. and Edmund H.2013. The transformation of Tajikistan: The sources of statehood. ThirdWorlds. London: Routledge.
Jafarova A. 2014. Uzbekistan criticizes WB report on Rogun HPP. www.azernews.az/analysis/69365.html.
Kleingeld E. 2016. The Rogun Dam in Tajik-Uzbek Official Discourse.Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Humanities Master Russian and Eurasian Studies. Leiden University.
Kai W K. 2008. Hydro-hegemony in the Amu Darya Basin. Water Policy, vol. 10, no 52, Londres, 2008.
Marat E. 2010. Will Tajikistan Successfully Construct Rogun? . Eurasia Daily Monitor, 7(17): (https://jamestown.org/analyst/erica-marat).
Menga F. 2015. Building a nation through a dam: the case of Rogun in Tajikistan. Nationalities Papers,43(3): 479-494.
Parshin K. 2008. Tajikistan: Citizens Ponder Bleak Future Amid Harsh Winter, Eurasianet, January 23, 2008, Accessed April 16, 2016, http://www.eurasianet.org/node/61697.
Parshin K. 2012. Tajikistan: Dushanbe Building Boom Blocks Out Economic Concerns. Eurasianet.org, May 1. Accessed October 12, 2012. http://www.eurasianet.org/node/65340.
Roy A. and Aradhana S. 2002. Dam/age: A film with Arundhati Roy. Brooklym, NY: First Run/Icarus Films.
Schmidt R. 2007. Feasibility study for completion of the Rogun scheme, Tajikistan. Hydropower & Dams.
Shakdam C. 2018. Nation-Building and the politics of state-building: the French example and its limitations. Al-Bayan Center for Planning and Studies.
Skoba L. 2013. Transboundary water management The Rogun Dam in Tajikistan.Library of the European Parliament.
Yerofeyeva N. 2002. Rogunskaya GES v Tadzhikistane budet dostroyena. No dlya etogo nuzhny inostrannyye investitsii. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, October.
ROGUN Hydroelectric Power Plant (HPP). 2016. www.diplomaticsquare.com/rogun-hydroelectric-power-plant-hpp.