Investigation on Efficiency of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) to Optimize Coagulation Process for Arsenic Removal from Water

Document Type : Applied Article

Authors

1 MSc Student in Agricultural Engineering, Department of Water Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic Azad University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Water Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic Azad University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Arsenic is a carcinogenic contaminant, and arsenic-contaminated drinking water is the major source of exposure to this hazardous metal. In recent years, the city of Sirjan has faced the problem of water sources pollution to arsenic and due to the existence of conventional water treatment plants in this city, the results of this study can be an important step to reduce and even eliminate this problem. In this study, the response surface methodology used to investigate the effect of pH (7,8,9), turbidity (<1,5,10,15,20 NTU), initial arsenic concentration (50,100,150,200,250 µg/l) and coagulant dose (5,10,15,20,25,30 mg/l) on the residual arsenic concentration after coagulation and flocculation process using ferric chloride. Synthesis of the tested samples was performed using the effluent of the treatment plant. Based on the results, the variables under study follow a quadratic model. The predicted quadratic model for the behavior of the parameters fits the results well. Investigation of the interaction effects of variables showed that the concentration of residual arsenic is greatly affected by pH so that by increasing it in the study area, the concentration of arsenic output also increases. This negative effect of increasing pH can be partially compensated by increasing turbidity. According to the coefficients of factors in this model, linear and square effects of pH, the interaction of pH and turbidity, and the linear effect of coagulant dose had the greatest effect on residual arsenic concentration. Taking into consideration of operation conditions, at pH=8, turbidity=5 NTU, using 20mg/l coagulant, reduced arsenic concentration from 150 µg/l to 3.84 µg/l

Keywords

Main Subjects


جمالی، ه، ع.، دینارلو، ک.، پناهی فرد، م. و مرادنیا، م. 1395. روش سطح پاسخ در بهینه‌سازی تصفیه فاضلاب صنایع فرش با استفاده  از فرات پتاسیم. مجله آب و فاضلاب، 29(2): 38-47.
 
AHMAD A., Ismsil  S. and Bhatia S. 2005. Optimization of coagulation− flocculation process for palm oil mill effluent using response surface methodology. Environmental science and technology, 39(8): 2828-2834.
Anouzia A., Abrouki Y., Souabia S., Safi M. and Rhbal H. 2009. Colour and COD removal of disperse dye solution by a novel coagulant: application of statistical design for the optimization and regression analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 166(2-3): 1302-1306.
Asadi Z. 2019. Investigation of the efficiency of coagulation process for ciprofloxacin antibiotic removal from aqueous solution. Journal of health research in community, 5(1): 38-48.
Baskan M. B. and Pala A. 2010. A statistical experiment design approach for arsenic removal by coagulation process using aluminum sulfate. Desalination, 254(1-3): 42-48.
Beltran-Heredia J., Sánchez-Martin J. and Gómez-Muñoz M. 2010. New coagulant agents from tannin extracts: Preliminary optimisation studies. Chemical Engineering Journal, 162(3): 1019-1025.
Bhatia S., Othman Z. and Ahmad A. L. 2007. Coagulation–flocculation process for POME treatment using Moringa oleifera seeds extract: optimization studies. Chemical Engineering Journal, 133(1-3): 205-212.
Bordoloi S., Nath S. K., Gogoi S. and Dutta R. K. 2013. Arsenic and iron removal from groundwater by oxidation–coagulation at optimized pH: laboratory and field studies. Journal of hazardous materials, 260: 618-626.
Carvalho G., Delee W., Novais J. and Pinheiro H. 2002. A factorially‐designed study of physicochemical reactive dye colour removal from simulated cotton textile processing wastewaters. Coloration technology, 118(5): 215-219.
Franceschi M., Girou A., Carro-Diaz A., Maurette M. and Puech-Costes E. 2002. Optimisation of the coagulation–flocculation process of raw water by optimal design method. Water research, 36(14): 3561-3572.
Hu C., Liu H., Chen G. and Qu J. 2012. Effect of aluminum speciation on arsenic removal during coagulation process. Separation and purification technology, 86: 35-40.
Kaboosi H., Tabari N. and Samadlouie H. R. 2014. Optimization of a-amylase production by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens using response surfaces methodology. Biological Journal of Microorganism, 3(11): 85-97.
Kong Y., Kang J., Shen J., Chen Z. and Fan L. 2017. Influence of humic acid on the removal of arsenate and arsenic by ferric chloride: effects of pH, As/Fe ratio, initial As concentration, and co-existing solutes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(3): 2381-2393.
Mishra A. K. and Ramaprabhu S. 2011. Functionalized graphene sheets for arsenic removal and desalination of sea water. Desalination, 282: 39-45.
Mohajeri S., Aziz H. A., Isa M. H., Zahed M. A. and Adlan M. N. 2010. Statistical optimization of process parameters for landfill leachate treatment using electro-Fenton technique. Journal of hazardous materials, 176(1-3): 749-758.
Mólgora C. C., Dominguez A. M., Avila E. M., Drogui P. and Buelna G. 2013. Removal of arsenic from drinking water: a comparative study between electrocoagulation-microfiltration and chemical coagulation-microfiltration processes. Separation and Purification Technology, 118: 645-651.
Mondal P., Bhowmick S., CHatterjee D., Figoli A. and Van Der Bruggen B. 2013. Remediation of inorganic arsenic in groundwater for safe water supply: a critical assessment of technological solutions. Chemosphere, 92(2): 157-170.
Noordin M. Y., Venkatesh V., SHarif S., Elting S. and Abdullah A. 2004. Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel. Journal of materials processing technology, 145(1): 46-58.
Omar F. M., Rahman N. N. N. A. and Ahmad A. 2008. COD reduction in semiconductor wastewater by natural and commercialized coagulants using response surface methodology. Water, air, and soil pollutio 195(1): 345-352.
PAllier V., Feuilade-Cathalifaud G., Serpaud B. and Bollinger J.-C. 2010. Effect of organic matter on arsenic removal during coagulation/flocculation treatment. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 342(1): 26-32.
Pio I., Scarlino A., Bloise E., Mele G., Santoro O., Pastore T. and Santoro D. 2015. Efficient removal of low-arsenic concentrations from drinking water by combined coagulation and adsorption processes. Separation and Purification Technology, 147: 284-291.
Pramanik B. K., Pramanik S. K. and Suja F. 2016. Removal of arsenic and iron removal from drinking water using coagulation and biological treatment. Journal of water and health, 14(1): 90-96.
Song S., Lopez-Valdivieso A., Hernandez-Campos D., Peng C., MonroyY-Fernandez M. and Razo-Soto I. 2006. Arsenic removal from high-arsenic water by enhanced coagulation with ferric ions and coarse calcite. Water research, 40(2): 364-372.
Taheriyoun M. and Memaripour A. 2019. Evaluation of Coagulation and Flocculation Process in Removal of Heavy Metals from Chemical Wastewater of Mobarakeh Steel Complex. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 21(6): 46-60.
Trinh T. K. and Kang L.-S. 2010. Application of response surface method as an experimental design to optimize coagulation tests. Environmental Engineering Research, 15(2): 63-70.
Wang J.-P., CHen Y.-Z., Ge X.-W. and Yu H.-Q. 2007. Optimization of coagulation–flocculation process for a paper-recycling wastewater treatment using response surface methodology. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 302(1-3): 204-210.
CAPTCHA Image
Volume 8, Issue 4 - Serial Number 22
Climate change has exacerbated extreme events
March 2022
Pages 77-86
  • Receive Date: 11 August 2021
  • Revise Date: 19 November 2021
  • Accept Date: 06 December 2021