Implementation of "Strategic Water Resources Management"; A proposed framework utilizing "Road Map" tool

Document Type : review paper

Authors

1 Former MSc , Water Engineering Department, Tarbiat modares, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Tarbiat modares University of tehran, Iran.

4 EXP, Hydrotechtoos Consulting Engineers of Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Action Without a framework, not justified and likely will face a failure or a problem. Due to the multiplicity of factors, extent and complexity of "water resource management context" and the long-term effectiveness of the measures in this context, a definitive explanation seems necessary. This paper proposed a framework, which is based on work carried out under the title "The strategic management of water resources in the southern province" has been prepared, it is reported. In this framework to transform "ideal vision" or the understanding of the overall solution, the utility plans "road map" is used. Framework's steps are: «The status quo», «Group owners discussion», «Developing a shared vision», «Explanation of macro policies», «Road map», «Defining operational policies» and at last «Operational planning». Each steps Details are presented. Before editing action plans, operational policies consistency with the four criteria of consensus, fairness, trustworthiness and reversible are controlled.

Keywords


آمار و اطلاعات شرکت آب منطقه‌ای استان خراسان جنوبی، 1388.
حکمت نیا، ح. و موسوی، م.ن. 1385 ، کاربرد مدل در جغرافیا با تأکید بر برنامه ریزی شهری و ناحیه ای، چاپ اول، انتشارات علم نوین، یزد.
سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان خراسان جنوبی. 1389.برنامه پنجم توسعه برنامه عملیاتی بخش کشاورزی استان خراسان جنوبی، ویرایش چهارم، معاونت برنامه ریزی استان خراسان جنوبی.
شرکت مدیریت منابع آب ایران، 1359، تاریخچه برنامه ریزی برای توسعه بهره برداری از منابع آب ایران (1327-1356)، به نقل از فریدون مبشری.
شریعتی، م. ت. 1383. چالش های برنامه ریزی مشارکتی محلی)روستایی (در ایران. مجموعه مقالات کنگره توسعه روستایی؛ چالش ها و چشم اندازها. انتشارات مؤسسه عالی آموزش و پژوهش مدیریت و برنامه ریزی. تهران. ص.337-357.
ش‍ری‍ف‍ی‌،م.ب.‌ ش‍ه‍ی‍دی‌پ‍ور،م.م.1380. تحل‍ی‍ل‌ س‍ی‍س‍ت‍م های‌ م‍ن‍اب‍ع‌ آب‌. ت‍ال‍ی‍ف‌ دانیل‌‌پ‌. لاکس‌، جری‌.‌ آر. اس‍ت‍دی‍ن‍گ‍ر، داگ‍لاس‌.‌ ا. ه‍ی‍ث، ناشر: دان‍ش‍گ‍اه‌ ف‍ردوس‍ی. ص‌. 714 – 716.
عابدی سروستانی، ا. 1385. جایگاه ترویج در توسعه با تأکید بر مشارکت. فصلنامه روستا و توسعه. سال 9، شماره 1: 136-165.
گلکار، ک. 1384. چشم انداز شهر / محله: پیشنهاد یک چارچوب مفهومی برای صورت بندی بیانیه چشم انداز. نشریه علمی-پژوهشی هنر های زیبا شماره 24.
منزوی. م، سرجه پیما، ع، آ.1386. محیط شناسی راهبردی بر اساس روش تحلیل روند و مدلSTEEP(V) . ماهنامه نگرش راهبردی شماره 85 و 86 : 9-22.
Beierle, T. C. 2000. Public participation in environmental decisions: an evaluation framework using social goals. Discuss. Pap 99 e 06, Resour. of the Future, Washington. D. C.
Cooke, B. Kothari, U. 2001. Participation, the New Tyranny? Zed Book s, Lon-don e New York.
Freeman, R.E .1984. Strategic Management: A stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing, 292 pages. ISBN: 9780521151740; Accessed via: Digital version by Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Gallego-Ayala, j. Juizo, D. 2011. Strategic implementation of integrated water resources management in Mozambique: An A’WOT analysis. 11th WaterNet/WARFSA/GWP-SA Symposium: IWRM for National and Regional Integration through Science, Policy and Practice. Pages 1103–1111.
Germain, R.H. Floyd, D.W. Stehman, S.V. 2001. Public participation of the USDA forest service public participation process. Forest Policy and Economics 3, 113e124.
GWP .2000. Integrated water resources management. Global Water Partnership–Technical Advisory Committee . Stockholm. Sweden.
International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI). 1996. The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide: an Introduction to Sustainable Development Planning. ICLEI. Toronto.
Kangas, J. Store, R. 2003. Internet and teledemocracy in participatory planning of natural resources management. Landscape and Urban Planning 62, 89 e10 1.
Kristensen, P. 2004 .The DPSIR Framework. workshop on a comprehensive / detailed assessment of the vulnerability of water resources to environmental change in Africa using river basin approach. UNEP Headquarters, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kurttila, M . 2000. Utilizing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in SWOT Analysis: A Hybrid Method and Its Application to a Forest Certification Case, Forest Policy and Economics. PP. 32-43.
Leach, W.D. Pelkey, N.W. Sabatier, P.A . 2002. Stakeholders partnerships as collaborative policymaking: evaluation criteria applied to watershed manage-ment in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21 (4), 645 e 670.
Lundberg, C. 2005. Conceptualizing the Baltic Sea ecosystem: an interdisciplinary tool for environmental desicion making. Ambio 34, 433–439.
Luyet, V. Schlaepfer, R. Parlange, M B. Buttler, A. 2012 . A framework to implement Stakeholder participation in environmental projects, Journal of Environmental Management, 111,213-e-219.
OECD. 2001. Citizen as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy Making. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://www.eldis.org/static/ DOC11520.htm.
Reed, M.S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141, 2417 e2431.
Richards, C. Black stock , K.L. Carter, C. 2004. Practical Approaches to Participation In: SERP Policy Brief, vol. 1. Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen.
Svarstad, H. Kjerulf Petersen, L. Rothman, D. Sieple, H. Wätzold, F. 2008. Discur-sive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR” Land Use Policy. 25, 116–125.
Terrados, J. and Almonacid, G. 2007. Regional Energy Planning Through SWOT Analysis.
Tscherning, K. Helming, K. Krippner, B. Sieber, S. Gomez, y. Paloma, S. 2012 .Does research applying the DPSIR framework support decision making?. Land Use Policy 29 (2012) 102– 11.
United Nations. 2000 .Guidelines on strategic planning and management of water resources. economic and social commission for Asia and the pacific., st/ESCAP/2346.
Webler, T. Tuler, S. Krueger, R. 2001. What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management 27 (3), 435 e 450.
Yükse, İ. and Metin, D. 2007. Using the Analytic Network Process (ANP) in a SWOT Analysis - A Case Study for a Textile Firm, Journal of Information Sciences, Vol. 177, Issue 16, Aug., pp 3364–3382.
CAPTCHA Image