Methods of controlling Hydrogen Sulfide production and emission in seweragee

Document Type : review paper

Authors

1 Ferdoosi university

2 Ferdowsi university

3 Islamic Azad University Tonekabon Branch

Abstract

Sulfide production has been one of the most important problems in sewage collection systems that came to be known as an important factor of corrosion in concrete sewerage systems since early 1900. The emission of hydrogen sulfide gas in sewerage conduits creates problems including biological corrosion of concrete, release of repulsive odors in the city environment, as well as the potential danger that the toxic sulfide gas poses for the workers. Several factors such as high sulfate density, the organic material, temperature, waste water retention period, pH, Oxidation reduction potential (ORP), flow rate and surface area can increase the probable emission of sulfide. Due to the adverse effects of this chemical material, in recent years broader studies have been conducted on the control of sulfide production in sewage collection networks, including the injection of air, nitrate, H2O2, and iron salt. The purpose of these studies was to find suitable solutions for controlling the emission of hydrogen sulfide taking into account the construction conditions and economic profitability. This article is a review of all the research done on controlling the production of sulfate in sewage collection systems. It also reviews the advantages and disadvantages of the methods used in these studies which have examined the effectiveness of using formaldehyde, MgO2/CaO2, MFCs, nitrates, microbe-eliminators. The results of this study show that using the aforementioned chemical and biological materials for controlling the challenges of hydrogen sulfide production in sewerage, besides being economical and effective, are able to protect sewerage from corrosion and we can also arrive at a healthy and odorless environment.

Keywords


ASCE. 1989. Sulfide in Wastewater Collection and Treatment Systems. Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York 69.
Bertran de Lis F., Saracevic E. and Matsche N. 2007 . Control of Sulphide problems in pressure sewers. Institute for Water Quality, Resources and Waste Management Vienna University of Technology. SESSION 4.3. A - 1040 Vienna, Karlsplatz 13/E 226, Austria.
Bentzen G., Smith AT., Bennett D., Webster NJ., Reinholt F., Sletholt E. and Hobson J. 1995. Controlled dosing of nitrate for prevention of H2S in a sewer network and the effects on the subsequent treatment processes. Water Sci Technol, 31(7): 293–302.
Boon A.G. 1995. Septicity in sewers: causes, consequences and containment. Water Sci Technol, 31(7): 237–253.
Charron I., Feliers C., Couvert A., Laplanche A., Patria L. and Requieme B. 2004. Use of hydrogen peroxide in scrubbing towers for odor removal in wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol, 50(4): 267–74.
Derek CWS. 1995. The control of septicity and odours in sewerage systems and at sewage treatment works operated by Anglian water service limited. Water Sci Technol, 31(7): 283–272.
Delgado S., Alvarez M., Rodriguez-Gomez L.E. and Aguiar E. 1999. H2S generation in a reclaimed urban wastewater. J. Water Res, 33(2): 539–547.
Einarsen A.M., Æsøy A., Rasmussen A., Bungum S. and Sveberg M. 2000. Biological prevention and removal of hydrogen sulphide in sludge at Lillehammer wastewater treatment plant. Water Sci, Technol, 41 (6): 175–187.
Elmaleh S., Delgado S., Alvarez M., Rodriguez-Gomez L.E. and Aguilar E. 1998. Forecasting of H2S build-up in a reclaimed wastewater pipe. J. Water Sci. & Tech, 10: 241–248.
Garcia De Lomas J., Corzo A., Gonzalez J.M., Andrades J.A., Iglesias E. and Montero M.J. 2005. Nitrate promotes biological oxidation of sulfide in wastewater: experiment at plant-scale. Biotechnol. Bioeng, 93 (4): 801–811.
Hobson J. and Yang G. 2000. The ability of selected chemicals for suppressing odor development in rinsing mains. J. Water Sci. & Tech, 41(6): 165–173.
Holder GA. and Leow JM. 1994. In-sewer oxygenation of wastewater using venturi side-stream dissolvers. Water Sci Technol, 30(1): 185–194.
Jensen A. 1990. How Tempe controls manhole odors. Public works, 121(4): 57–58.
Lomas J.G., Corzo A., Gonzalez J. M, Andrades J.A., Iglesias E. and Montero M.J. 2005. Nitrate promotes biological oxidation of sulfide in wastewaters: experiment at plant-scale. J. Biotech. Bio-eng, 93(4): 801–811.
Okabe S., Ito T., Satoh H. and Watanabe Y. 2003. Effect of nitrite and nitrate on biogenic sulfide production in sewer biofilms determined by the use of microelectrodes. Water Sci, Technol, 47(11): 281–288.
Nielsen, A.H., Hvitved-Jacobsen T. and Vollertsen J. 2006. Recent findings on sinks for sulfide in gravity sewer networks. Water Sci. Technol. 52: Sewerage Systems. US Environmental Protection Agency Technology Transfer Office, Washington, DC EPA-625/1-74-005.
Nielsen A.H., Vollertsen J. and Hvitved-Jacobsen T. 2005c. Kinetics and stoichiometry of sulfide oxidation by sewer biofilms. Environ, Water Res, 39: 4119–4125.
Sercombe DCW. 1995. The control of septicity and odors in sewerage systems and at sewage treatment works operated by Anglian Water Services Limited. Water Sci Technol, 31(7): 283–292.
Takatoshi O., Mitsuo K. and Syuji T. 1998. Controlling sulphide generation in force mains by air injection. Water Sci Technol, 37(1): 87–95.
Tanaka N. and Takenaka K. 1995. Control of hydrogen sulfide and degradation of organic matter by air Injection into a wastewater force-main. Water Sci Technol, 31(7): 273–282.
Tomar M. and Abdullah T.A. 1994. Evaluation of chemicals to control the generation of malodorous hydrogen sulfide in waste water. Water Res, 28(12): 2542–2552.
Pomeroy R.D. and Kienow K.E. 1982. Prediction of Sulfide Buildup in Sanitary Sewers. Jounral of Environmental Engineering Division, 108(5): 941-956.
Padival N.A., Kimbell W.A. and Redner J.A. 1995. Use iron salts to control dissolved sulfide in trunk sewers. J Environ Eng ASCE, 121(11): 824–829.
Poulton W.S., Krom M.D., Rijn J.V. and Raiswell R. 2002. The use of hydrous iron (III) oxides for the removal of hydrogen sulphide in aqueous systems. Water Res, 3(6): 825–834.
Rodriguez-Gomez L.E., Delgado S., Alvarez M. and Elmaleh S. 2005. Inhibition of sulfide generation in a reclaimed wastewater pipe by nitrate dosage and denitrification kinetics. Water Environ, Res, 77: 193–198.
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1974. Process Design Manual for Sulfide Control in Sanitary Sewerage Systems. US Environmental Protection Agency Technology Transfer Office. Washington. DC EPA- 625/1-74-005.
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1991. Hydrogen sulphide corrosion in wastewater collection and treatment system. Technical Report, 430/09-91-010.
USEPA. 1985. Design manual for odor and corrosion control in sanitary sewerage systems and treatment plants. Center for Environmental Research Information, USEPA. Office of Research and Development. Cincinnati; EPA/625/1-85/018.
Waltrip G.D. and Snyder G.E. 1985. Elimination of odor at six major wastewater treatment plants. J, WPCF, 57: 1027–1032.
Yang W., Vollertsen J. and Hvitved-Jacobsen T. 2005. Anoxic sulfide oxidation in wastewater of sewer networks. Water Sci, Technol, 52(30): 191–199.
Zhang L., DeSchryver P., DeGusseme B., DeMuynck W., Boon N. and Verstraete W. 2008. Chemical and biological technologies for hydrogen sulfide emission control in sewer systems: A review. Water Research, 42(1-2): 1-12.
CAPTCHA Image
Volume 2, Issue 2 - Serial Number 5
Economic Implications for Water Management Policies or Programs
March 2016
Pages 43-50
  • Receive Date: 09 September 2015
  • Accept Date: 09 September 2015